Sazzle
TS Administrator
- Favourite Ride
- Steel Vengeance
Of course we can all disagree. And I don't expect people to apologise for thinking the strikes are pathetic. It's evident that people did not read my original post properly, had they done they would've seen I was saying the strikes are pathetic because one sector has followed another after another after another. I'm all for improving workplace standards and improving pay and I don't think strike action is always the way to go about it, but if train strikes hadn't started last year, I highly doubt other sectors would've struck since.
That's not what I meant. If only people read things properly before replying. I've seen it time and time again here, sometimes we're too quick to reply.
If I may offer my thoughts on your opinions?
I have indeed arrived from that topic and wish to share my views further."It's evident that people did not read my post properly"
I assure you I have read your post, the subsequent posts, and your further responses.
My view opposes yours and I would be grateful for you to read my response with the assurance that I am fully informed of your views and your post content.
To offer your view by immediately using such an emotive term, unnecessarily, to label a large number of professionals across a multitude of workforce sectors is guaranteed to afford you negative responses. There are many, many ways to offer your view on a topic, and using the word pathetic is not going to help you win friends and influence people."I was thinking that strikes are pathetic because..."
Does a point-by-point multi quote approach work for you, in confirming I have read things properly? I assure you once again I have read your post, and I will offer my opinion hereafter. Please also note that my time in replying has been with consideration; it has not been quick."If only people read things properly before replying" [...] "sometimes we're too quick to reply"
How can inflation affect industrial action? Just doesn’t add up to me, although I could be missing something here.
Although that graph from the ONS is accurate, I rarely trust anything else the ONS produces…but that’s a discussion for elsewhere, and if anyone can be bothered.
"...Although I could be missing something here". I feel that you are indeed missing something here. I assume from that statement that you are financially secure enough to not be affected by the rise in the cost of living due to the depreciation in your wages to such a level you need to take action as part of a collective in order to meet the aforementioned cost of living. Alternatively, you are affected and you carry on regardless.
"but that's a discussion for elsewhere, and if anyone can be bothered". Not really. I am an advocate for the information that the ONS provides to our Government and society, and don't wish to engage in a debate if you are so willingly dismissive of it despite stating the graph posted in the thread is accurate. A hypocritical statement, which immediately undermines the latter half of your statement.
As for the actual debate around strikes, and sectors following each other, I don't believe that it started with one and that there were followers. I believe that different sectors have, at varying times, felt the pressure of their leaders not offering them pay awards that reflect the amount of work they do along with the ability to keep up the standard of living that they have previously afforded.
My bottom line:
Don't tell me to tighten my purse strings when I am working as hard (harder in fact!!) as I did 365 days ago, for the same wage, and yet I can't afford to put the same things in my trolley at the supermarket every week. That is where strike action comes from; not following another sector.