I just genuinely don't get this place's obsession with the Retrosquad as if there is a gaping flat ride chasm in the ride line-up. Universal are opening a new park in a little over a year's time and within the entire place there are two flat rides and one of those is a carousel.
And it'll have absolutely zero impact on ticket sales nor everyone raving about how good the place is.
It's never been part of the RS tbf, so even if it was leaving (which it might) it wouldn't be in that video anywayI notice in that video there’s only 3 robots leaving, suggests Flavio’s is permanent?
Retro Squad were fantastic for what they were, a sticking plaster and a quick fix for years of underinvestment and poor maintenance of existing flat rides. The theming was measured and considered, for what they were, but they were always going to be temporary. The park is aware of its capacity problems, it's why they brought in RS in the first place. The park have said, on many occasion, that RS is/was a temporary solution to capacity issues whilst they work on more permanent solutions.
It's clear that Merlin's parks are getting the kind of level of investment we haven't seen since the Tussaud's days in the 90s and early 2000s. It's a new Merlin, they do have a long way to go, but they're clearly trying to earn our faith and trust back. The moves that they've been making are all about getting their parks back to a world class standard, but they're having to turn a very big ship around and it can take some time. Can we not all be a little bit more optimistic, hopeful and give them a chance? The secrecy of their plans, and little to no communication on certain issues is frustrating, but isn't that sort of really what we like? If we were constantly told absolutely everything that was happening, all of the time, where would the fun be?
Removing capacity, in the form of regularly serviced travelling fairground rides, is reactive and not proactive? I'm really not sure I understand.I dont think they are trying to earn anyones faith or trust back, certainly not the enthusiasts. More a case of years of neglect and underinvestment coming back to bite them as their ageing hardware is all kicking the bucket in quick succession. I would say all of this is reactive rather than proactive, and only time will tell whether that attitude shifts going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Removing capacity, in the form of regularly serviced travelling fairground rides, is reactive and not proactive? I'm really not sure I understand.
I literally addressed that in my original post.I’m referring to the fact they had to have them in the first place.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Retro Squad were fantastic for what they were, a sticking plaster and a quick fix for years of underinvestment and poor maintenance of existing flat rides. The theming was measured and considered, for what they were, but they were always going to be temporary.
You been on my stash again haven't you.there were lot enough goats and filler dies
I literally addressed that in my original post.
What are these gaping holes in the ride line-up?
You been on my stash again haven't you.
On topic, never rode one...happy to see them come...kept the coaster queues down, but happy to see them go...they didn't fit.