Meat Pie said:
Tim - I find you very rude also. In terms of tone, I give exactly back what you emit.
I've just had enough, even after you are proved categorically wrong, you can't accept it's a mistake on your part and that marketeers and graphic designers did their job well, instead you have to invent that they've been inaccurate.
There was nothing in those original images that showed a lap-bar, and finally we have proof. Give it up.
Hey hang on m...ate (lol), you are being out of order and far too cock sure.
I usually defend your posts, but Tim has expressed disappointment that some great theme elements that were present on promotional images, (actually a COMPLIMENT), were not used on the car design itself.
Way, way too much gloating going on around here - I loved the idea of lapbars, but it's OTSRs, well done those who stayed to their points. Many of you were convinced that camera image had NOTHING to do with the inversion number either...
Good gracious me, talk about pruning your feathers pmsl!
As for the trains, compared to that image we all were having a good mooch at these are no where near as good. That I believe is what is being said here. The others looked far more like some kind of contraption, these, er, don't.
Oooooooooh they have yellow - and that's about the difference other than two extra rows from Saw. Oh, and a Smiley face.
I am really, really not that arsed whether it was Lap Bars or OTSR's (before anyone argues, read my previous posts), I was however convinced it would be Lap Bars - and had a bit of tongue in cheek fun about it all.
But the display in here of people waving their proverbial manhoods around, you'd think you'd never been right about anything before lol!!
Well done you, it's an inferior ride system and car design - gosh, you must be proud ;D
pmsl, honestly.
Oh hang on - let me buckle up (well, OTSR technically now) for a tirade of abuse as I dared to criticise something again... can't have that can we.