- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter Danny
- Start date
- Favourite Ride
- Steel Vengeance
- Favourite Ride
- Steel Vengeance
- Favourite Ride
- Steel Vengeance
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
SeaWorld Orlando: General Discussion
Stevie
TS Member
I agree, looks like a cookie cutter, bland B&M hyper.It looks crap if I'm honest.
Nothing excited me on that video.
Rob
TS Team
Crap? Does it really look crap? Why do some enthusiasts insist that anything which doesn't look to be better or on par with the next best of that type of coaster is rubbish or crap. If you think it looks crap then you really need to go and ride some more coasters. Here are some crap coasters:
I find with airtime coasters such as this it is impossible to know what it will be like until it is up and running; you can never be sure just how much airtime there will be. And even if it isn't an amazing coaster it doesn't make it crap. I'd be shocked if this was bad enough to be considered crap as I have never ridden a crap B&M.
/rant




I find with airtime coasters such as this it is impossible to know what it will be like until it is up and running; you can never be sure just how much airtime there will be. And even if it isn't an amazing coaster it doesn't make it crap. I'd be shocked if this was bad enough to be considered crap as I have never ridden a crap B&M.
/rant
Rob
TS Team
I quite like 2 of the above![]()
I tried my best to pick some coasters universally accepted as crap, sorry!
Again enthusiasts being protective and on there high horse about upcoming projects! Everyone's entitled to there own opinion Rob.
And for your information believe I or not I do genuinely rate G Force! I'm just stating whats eye catching about this new coaster... well apart from it being tall.. Nothing!
And for your information believe I or not I do genuinely rate G Force! I'm just stating whats eye catching about this new coaster... well apart from it being tall.. Nothing!
Rob
TS Team
Again enthusiasts being protective and on there high horse about upcoming projects! Everyone's entitled to there own opinion Rob.
And for your information believe I or not I do genuinely rate G Force! I'm just stating whats eye catching about this new coaster... well apart from it being tall.. Nothing!
How am I being on a high horse? I was merely having a little rant about something that rather frustrates me across the enthusiast community. Crap is defined as "something of extremely poor quality" - are you seriously telling me that a B&M mega coaster fits this definition? It would have to be considerably worse than the ones I have ridden to be defined as crap!
Does a coaster have to have something eye catching otherwise it gets branded as crap these days then? No wonder Merlin insist on silly gimmicks! The leaked layout of Valravn at Cedar Point is not particuarally eye catching; it does little more than Griffon which was built almost 10 years previously. I'll be interested to see if it is branded as crap also.
Again, the coaster goes up to a really high height and drops. That's it. As for Merlins "Gimmicks" Yes, I agree. However I don't feel The Smiler was a gimmick. Its a normal rollercoaster with 14 loops. That's what set it aside from other rollerocoasters, non of this gimmicky crap. TH13TEEN on the other hand, well the less said about that the better.
Martin
TS Member
Still don't know how Thirteen's drop can be called a gimmick when the entire ride is designed and built around it, was the entire basis for the ride, cost millions to develop and inspired another company to make their own, cheaper version of it. If anything, the outdoors part of Thirteen is the tacked on gimmick.
Alexsutton
TS Member
With that definition,I would argue you could apply that to any theme park attraction.
Martin
TS Member
Gimmick is normally used as a derogative, to imply something is cheap, throwaway and cynical.
And when people say rides like this are boring or crap, it's relative. They're not saying they'd rather ride an SLC or something, it just means that there was potential for a much more interesting and unique ride, rather than something that, like this, looks like it had a minimal amount of effort put in and wouldn't stand out amongst its type even if it was built ten years ago.
And when people say rides like this are boring or crap, it's relative. They're not saying they'd rather ride an SLC or something, it just means that there was potential for a much more interesting and unique ride, rather than something that, like this, looks like it had a minimal amount of effort put in and wouldn't stand out amongst its type even if it was built ten years ago.